Formalization: A Minimax Lower Bound for Interior Dose-Response Estimation
The complete Lean development behind this paper — every definition, lemma, and theorem of its module, including helpers the paper text never cites. Identifiers link within this page, into the Causalean library, or out to the official Mathlib docs.
Basic 28 declarations Environment S1 — i.i.d. observational continuous-dose sampling world
Environment S1 — i.i.d. observational continuous-dose sampling world
Observed unit O = (Y, A, X) with outcome Y ∈ ℝ, continuous treatment A ∈ [0,1], and covariate vector X ∈ [0,1]^d. The carrier fields are typed over ℝ / Fin d → ℝ (the witness measure constructions require ℝ-valued ranges), and the declared treatment range [0,1] and covariate cube [0,1]^d are pinned as a STANDING a.s. support clause on the law by the two IidSampling support conjuncts (A ∈ [0,1] and X ∈ [0,1]^d almost surely under P), which every law in HolderDoseClass carries via HolderDoseClass.iid. Y is unconstrained (ℝ). @realizes O
Definition (Lean source)
The observed-data type is made measurable by identifying each observation with its outcome, treatment, and covariate tuple.
Definition (Lean source)
The covariate cube [0,1]^d.
The interior treatment window [t_0 - ε_0, t_0 + ε_0].
Definition (Lean source)
Univariate Hölder ball of order order and radius M on a set S ⊆ ℝ: all derivatives up to the largest integer k = ⌈order⌉ - 1 strictly below order exist continuously on S, are bounded by M, and the k-th derivative is (order - k)-Hölder with constant M. This is the standard nonparametric C^{⌈order⌉-1, order-⌈order⌉+1} convention, including integer orders.
Definition (Lean source)
Multivariate Hölder ball of order order and radius M on a set S ⊆ (Fin d → ℝ): all iterated Fréchet derivatives up to the largest integer k = ⌈order⌉ - 1 strictly below order exist continuously on S, are bounded by M in operator norm, and the k-th derivative is (order - k)-Hölder with constant M. Notation for the library ball Causalean.Stat.Nonparametric.HolderBallStd (same ⌈order⌉-1 convention).
Definition (Lean source)
Build-inline observed-law object: the per-draw observation law, the covariate marginal, the law-side nuisances μ_P, π_P, p_{X,P}, and the potential-outcome process Y(·) (the causal overlay S2).
O_1, …, O_n are i.i.d. draws from P. Carries the full i.i.d. content by reusing Causalean.Stat.IIDSample (mutually independent, identically distributed measurable maps with law P.dataMeasure), together with IsProbabilityMeasure P.dataMeasure certifying that the per-draw law — hence the n-fold product Measure.pi (fun _ : Fin n => P.dataMeasure) formed in minimaxRisk — is a probability measure. Also pins the observed-unit support O = (Y,A,X) to the sampling space {(Y,A,X): Y∈ℝ, A∈[0,1], X∈[0,1]^d}: under P the treatment A ∈ [0,1] and the covariate vector X ∈ [0,1]^d almost surely. @realizes O(the IidSampling conjunction pins the observed-unit law a.s. to {(Y,A,X): Y∈ℝ, A∈[0,1], X∈[0,1]^d} through its A-support and X-support conjuncts)
Definition (Lean source)
Consistency Y = Y(A) almost surely under P: the realized outcome equals the potential outcome at the realized treatment level.
Definition (Lean source)
Conditional ignorability for the continuous treatment: for every level a ∈ [0,1], the potential outcome Y(a) is independent of A given X under P (the note restricts the dose to the treatment range [0,1]). Encoded in the faithful tested form E[f(Y(a)) ∣ A, X] = E[f(Y(a)) ∣ X] for every bounded measurable test f of the potential outcome (the standard conditional-independence characterization, no StandardBorelSpace requirement).
Definition (Lean source)
Bounded outcome |Y| ≤ M almost surely under P.
Definition (Lean source)
Interior evaluation point: [t_0 - ε_0, t_0 + ε_0] ⊆ (0,1).
Definition (Lean source)
Local positivity: π_P(a∣x) ≥ c_0 for every a in the ε_0-window and every x ∈ [0,1]^d.
Definition (Lean source)
Treatment-direction smoothness: for every x ∈ [0,1]^d, the slice a ↦ μ_P(a,x) lies in a Hölder ball of order α, radius M, on the window.
Definition (Lean source)
Treatment-direction smoothness of the conditional treatment density: for every x ∈ [0,1]^d, a ↦ π_P(a∣x) lies in a Hölder ball of order β, radius M, on the window.
Definition (Lean source)
Covariate-direction smoothness: x ↦ μ_P(t_0,x) lies in a Hölder ball of order s, radius M, on [0,1]^d.
Definition (Lean source)
Covariate-direction smoothness of the conditional treatment density: x ↦ π_P(t_0∣x) lies in a Hölder ball of order s, radius M, on [0,1]^d.
Definition (Lean source)
Covariate-density smoothness and range: p_{X,P} lies in a Hölder ball of order s, radius M, on [0,1]^d, is NONNEGATIVE (0 ≤ p_{X,P} on the cube — the declared density range [0,∞)), and is bounded above by M. The nonnegativity conjunct makes p_{X,P} a genuine density object: with it ENNReal.ofReal (P.px x) = P.px x on the cube, so the PxIsXDensity tie realizes the ACTUAL p_{X,P} density rather than only its ofReal positive part.
Definition (Lean source)
Nonempty-interior-of-model (strict-slack baseline) existence hypothesis: there exist a covariate density p_0 on [0,1]^d, a conditional treatment density q_0 on [0,1], a slack η_0 > 0, and an outcome scale B_0 ∈ (0,M), such that p_0 and q_0 have Hölder norms at most M - η_0 in the classes required of p_{X,P} and π_P, q_0(a) ≥ c_0 + η_0 on the ε_0-window, p_0 ≤ M - η_0, and the constant-zero outcome regression admits a symmetric two-point channel on {-B_0, B_0} ⊆ [-M,M]. Provisional D0.R refinement (user_approved = false).
Definition (Lean source)
Semantic tie (μ is the data regression). The conditional mean of Y given (A,X) under the data law equals μ_P(A,X). This pins the free mu field to the actual law, so thetaFunctional = ∫ μ_P(t_0,·)·p_{X,P} is the GENUINE causal value E_P[Y(t_0)] (under consistency + ignorability). Without it mu is disconnected from dataMeasure, which permits a vacuous two-point construction (a Dirac data law with the separation carried only by the free mu); enforcing it makes minimaxRisk the true causal minimax risk.
Definition (Lean source)
Semantic tie (p_{X,P} is the X-marginal density). The pushforward of the data law under X is p_{X,P}·(Lebesgue ↾ [0,1]^d), tying the free px field to the actual covariate law so thetaFunctional integrates μ against the genuine P_X.
Definition (Lean source)
Semantic tie / range-normalization (π_P is the conditional treatment density). The pushforward of the data law under (A,X) equals the measure with joint density (a,x) ↦ π_P(a∣x)·p_{X,P}(x) w.r.t. Lebesgue on [0,1]×[0,1]^d. Together with PxIsXDensity (the X-marginal is p_{X,P}·Leb) this pins π_P(·∣x) to be the GENUINE conditional density of A given X = x under P — it is normalized (∫_{[0,1]} π_P(a∣x) da = 1 for P_X-a.e. x, forced by consistency of the joint with its X-marginal) and tied to dataMeasure. Without it the pi field is disconnected from dataMeasure, so the class P_{α,β,s} would be strictly BROADER than the paper class (an arbitrary π field satisfying only the Hölder/positivity atoms, never required to be the law's actual treatment density). The core symbol pi_P(a∣x) is defined as the conditional density of A given X = x under P, so this tie is exactly the note's stated meaning of π_P, not an added restriction. The leading conjunct ENFORCES the declared density range 0 ≤ π_P on [0,1]×[0,1]^d: with it ENNReal.ofReal (π_P·p_{X,P}) genuinely equals π_P·p_{X,P} (both factors nonnegative, using PxHolder's 0 ≤ p_{X,P}), so the tie realizes the ACTUAL nonnegative conditional treatment density object, not only its ofReal positive part. @realizes pi_P(0 ≤ π_P on [0,1]×cube enforcing the declared range [0,∞), AND P.dataMeasure.map (A,X) = (Leb↾[0,1] ⊗ Leb↾[0,1]^d).withDensity (π_P·p_{X,P}); together the range-clause + joint-factorization tie pin pi to the law's genuine nonnegative conditional treatment density)
Definition (Lean source)
The anisotropic Hölder dose-response model class P_{α,β,s}(M,c_0,ε_0,t_0): the bundle of the member-atom properties, including the three SEMANTIC TIES (μ_P is the data regression, p_{X,P} is the X-marginal density, and π_P is the law's conditional treatment density) that make it a genuine CAUSAL class and pin it to EXACTLY the paper class (so minimaxRisk over it is the true causal minimax risk and thetaFunctional is E_P[Y(t_0)], not a free-field artifact, and the class is not strictly broader than P_{α,β,s} through a free π field). (ass:baseline-submodel-slack is NOT a member; it is a separate theorem hypothesis.) The two regime theorems take (hP : HolderDoseClass … P).
Definition (Lean source)
Standing well-formedness of the S3 regime constants: each lies in its declared space — α, β, s, M, c_0 ∈ (0,∞), t_0 ∈ (0,1), ε_0 ∈ (0,1/2). This is the ENFORCING realization cluster for those setup symbols; it is threaded as a hypothesis into every regime lemma/theorem so the constants are never used outside their declared spaces.
Definition (Lean source)
Identifying partial-mean (backdoor-adjustment) functional θ_P(t_0) = ∫_{[0,1]^d} μ_P(t_0,x) p_{X,P}(x) dx (Lebesgue). Under consistency and ignorability this equals the causal dose-response value E_P[Y(t_0)].
Definition (Lean source)
Pointwise minimax mean-squared risk R_n(C, t_0) = inf_{θ̂_n} sup_{P ∈ C} E_P[(θ̂_n - θ_P(t_0))^2]. The infimum ranges over MEASURABLE estimators truncated to [-M,M] (the bounded-estimand range: truncating to the interval containing every θ_P(t_0) never increases MSE and yields the SAME minimax value, while keeping the inner squared loss bounded by (2M)^2 under each n-fold probability law — so the ⨆/⨅ are well-posed, with no junk-0 inflation of the converse).
Definition (Lean source)
Published Bonvini–Kennedy benchmark rate ρ_n = n^{-2α/(2α+1)} ∨ n^{-2/(1 + d/(4s) + 1/α)}. @realizes rho_n
Definition (Lean source)
The published-rate frontier sequence is nonnegative, enforcing the declared range ρ_n ∈ [0,∞) of the setup symbol rho_n: each branch (n:ℝ)^(·) is an rpow of the nonnegative base (n:ℝ) ≥ 0, hence ≥ 0, and the max preserves it. @realizes rho_n
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Frontier 1 declarations
Headline frontier handle. For EVERY β > 0, records the DELIVERED all-β oracle lower floor R_n ≥ c n^{-2α/(2α+1)} on the corresponding original class, together with the regime-by-regime ρ_n comparison for every n ≥ 1. The deficient comparison is restricted to the note's regime 0 < s < d/4. The final disjunction records, without selecting or certifying an upper endpoint, the unresolved upper-frontier alternatives: attainability of ρ_n, an intermediate exponent, or genuinely β-sensitive rates.
Definition (Lean source)
Helpers.Divergence 2 declarations
The signed two-point mean channel has quadratic KL divergence on the central half of its mean range. This local wrapper links the paper lemma to the reusable Causalean implementation.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Le Cam's two-point reduction: a finite KL budget gives a positive, budget-dependent constant multiplying the squared parameter separation.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Helpers.FrontierBracket 1 declarations
Certified β-frontier bracket. Assume the strict-slack baseline. For every β > 0 there is c > 0 with R_n ≥ c n^{-2α/(2α+1)} eventually; and — for EVERY n ≥ 1, not merely eventually, matching the note's unconditional ρ_n algebra — in the smooth-covariate regime s ≥ d/4 (d ≤ 4s) the benchmark ρ_n collapses to that oracle exponent, while in the deficient regime 0 < s < d/4 (4s < d) ρ_n has a strictly smaller exponent. The regime identities are stated outside the ∀ᶠ n (eventually) clause so they are NOT weakened to large n only. No same-class upper endpoint is packaged.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Helpers.RateAlgebra 2 declarations
Smooth-covariate collapse: if 0 < α, 0 < s, and d ≤ 4 s (i.e. s ≥ d/4), then ρ_n = n^{-2α/(2α+1)} for every n ≥ 1.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Deficient-covariate collapse: if 0 < α, 0 < s, and 4 s < d (i.e. 0 < s < d/4), then ρ_n = n^{-2/(1 + d/(4s) + 1/α)} for every n ≥ 1, and the deficient exponent is strictly smaller than the oracle exponent.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Helpers.TwoPointConstruction 3 declarations
Uniform bound on the identifying functional over the model class: |θ_P(t_0)| ≤ M · M · vol([0,1]^d). Used for BddAbove of the worst-case risk.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The two-point Le Cam reduction in minimax form: two class members with bounded KL between their n-fold product laws force the pointwise minimax risk to be at least c_K times their squared target separation.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The all-β oracle lower floor. Assume the strict-slack baseline. For every β > 0 there is c_or > 0, depending only on the fixed model radii and the slack baseline (not on n), such that for all sufficiently large n, R_n(P_{α,β,s}(M,c_0,ε_0,t_0), t_0) ≥ c_or n^{-2α/(2α+1)}. The construction perturbs only the treatment regression and leaves the treatment density fixed, so the bound is independent of whether β ≥ α.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Helpers.UpperBoundCited 19 declarations This supportive cited leaf records the conditional risk implication in arXiv:2207.11825v1, Section 3.4, Theorem 1 and Remarks 7–8/Figure 1 (Theorem 3.1 in v2).
Cited conditional upper-risk comparator (Bonvini–Kennedy 2022)
This supportive cited leaf records the conditional risk implication in arXiv:2207.11825v1, Section 3.4, Theorem 1 and Remarks 7–8/Figure 1 (Theorem 3.1 in v2). It deliberately does not state a class-level minimax bound.
u ≲ v eventually, with the positive constant made explicit.
Definition (Lean source)
Two-sided eventual comparison, used for the source's ≍ tuning relations.
Definition (Lean source)
Inputs from which the Bonvini–Kennedy second-order estimator used in the Figure 1 rho_n comparison is constructed. The nuisance estimates are indexed by training-sample size. The estimator and every risk/error quantity below are definitions computed from these inputs; no influence kernel is a free field.
The localized kernel K_ht appearing in the source theorem.
Definition (Lean source)
The source's first approximate influence function: the localized inverse-density residual score plus the plug-in regression value at the target dose.
Definition (Lean source)
The source's first residual factor f₁.
Definition (Lean source)
The source's inverse-density residual factor f₂.
Definition (Lean source)
The second approximate influence kernel from Section 3.3: -f₁(Z₁) Π_hat(X₁,X₂) f₂(Z₂). It is definitionally pinned to the estimated projection kernel and nuisance estimates.
Definition (Lean source)
The specified second-order estimator used for the source's Figure 1 rate: the empirical mean of the first approximate influence function plus the order-two U-statistic. The injection sum counts each unordered pair 2! times, so the normalization is exactly 2! * choose n 2, not merely choose n 2.
Definition (Lean source)
Conditional MSE of the specified estimator, conditional on its nuisance-training sample, under the actual i.i.d. evaluation-sample law.
Definition (Lean source)
Lebesgue L² norm on the covariate cube.
Definition (Lean source)
Application of the source's true finite-dimensional projection kernel.
Definition (Lean source)
Actual outcome-regression nuisance error ‖v‖_g.
Definition (Lean source)
Actual reciprocal-treatment-density nuisance error ‖q‖_g.
Definition (Lean source)
Product of the actual projection-residual norms of the two nuisance errors.
Definition (Lean source)
Actual uniform error of the estimated joint density at the target dose.
Definition (Lean source)
Assumptions 1–2 and Conditions 1–4 of Bonvini–Kennedy Theorem 1/3.1, spelled out on the source estimator inputs.
Definition (Lean source)
The source's explicit post-theorem rate specialization. Every error sequence is the actual quantity defined from E; no premise can be satisfied by choosing an unrelated favorable sequence.
Definition (Lean source)
Cited conditional comparator (Bonvini–Kennedy 2022, Theorem 1/3.1 and rate discussion; arXiv:2207.11825v1, Section 3.4 and Remarks 7–8/Figure 1). For the source's specified HOIF construction, the theorem conditions and explicit rate specialization imply the eventual bound on its actual conditional MSE.
Definition (Lean source)
Helpers.Witness.Base 11 declarations
The unit covariate cube is a measurable set.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
A nonnegative density on a measurable restriction that integrates to one defines a probability measure after weighting the restricted measure.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
On a finite measure space, a measurable real function that is almost surely bounded in absolute value is integrable.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The map sending an observation to its outcome, treatment, and covariate tuple is measurable.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The observed outcome coordinate is a measurable function of the observation.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The observed treatment coordinate is a measurable function of the observation.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The observed covariate coordinate is a measurable function of the observation.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The observed-data space has measurable singleton sets.
Definition (Lean source)
For fixed treatment and covariates, forming an observation from an outcome is measurable.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Forming an observation from covariates, treatment, and outcome is measurable.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Base-coordinate marginal of a bind whose fibre is reattached by a map.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Helpers.Witness.BumpHolder 1 declarations
SUBSTRATE GATE (the only one of the genuine construction). For a positive Hölder order α and radius M, there is a fixed amplitude λ ∈ (0, M/4] such that for every sign ζ ∈ {−1, +1} and every bandwidth h ∈ (0,1], the scaled smooth bump slice a ↦ ζ·λ·h^α·doseBump((a−t_0)/h) lies in the univariate order-α radius-M Hölder ball on the evaluation window [t_0−ε_0, t_0+ε_0]. This is the classical h^α-normalized Hölder estimate for ContDiffBump; everything else in the construction is proved. The amplitude bound λ ≤ M/4 is the constraint consumed by the two-point KL band (|μ_ζ| ≤ λ ≤ B/2 with B = M/2).
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Helpers.Witness.Channel 5 declarations
The outcome Markov kernel (a,x) ↦ twoPointMean B (μ_ζ(a,x)) pushed onto the observed-unit space by y ↦ (y, a, x). This is the single conditional kernel that, composed with the shared (A,X)-marginal doseAXMeasure, reproduces the genuine joint law doseDataMeasure.
Definition (Lean source)
Applying the outcome channel at a treatment-covariate pair gives the two-point outcome law pushed forward to the observed-data space at that same pair.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
If the two-point outcome laws are valid probability laws, then the witness outcome channel is a Markov kernel.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
If the witness covariate and treatment measures are probability measures, then their joint treatment-covariate measure is also a probability measure.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The genuine nested X → A → Y joint law equals the single bind of the shared (A,X)-marginal against the outcome channel. This is the bridge that lets the regression, ignorability, and KL leaves work over one Measure.bind.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Helpers.Witness.Core 21 declarations Smooth treatment bump
Smooth treatment bump
A fixed smooth bump supported in (-1,1) and equal to one near zero.
Definition (Lean source)
The treatment bump is the fixed smooth bump function evaluated at a real argument.
Definition (Lean source)
The treatment bump equals one at the center of the bump.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The treatment bump is everywhere nonnegative.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The treatment bump is everywhere bounded above by one.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The absolute value of the treatment bump is everywhere bounded by one.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The treatment bump vanishes at every point whose distance from the center is at least one in the normalized coordinate.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The treatment bump is a measurable real-valued function.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The witness conditional mean is a localized treatment bump with amplitude given by the product of the sign, scale, bandwidth power, and smoothness constant.
Definition (Lean source)
The witness conditional mean is measurable as a function of treatment and covariates.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
For fixed covariates, the two-point outcome law pushed to observed triples varies measurably with the treatment value.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The probability assigned by the pushed-forward two-point outcome law to any measurable event is a measurable function of covariates and treatment.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The witness covariate measure is Lebesgue measure on the unit covariate cube weighted by the covariate density.
Definition (Lean source)
The witness treatment measure is Lebesgue measure on the unit treatment interval weighted by the treatment density.
Definition (Lean source)
Integrating the treatment law against the two-point outcome law gives an outcome kernel that is measurable as a function of covariates.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The joint treatment-covariate measure first samples covariates from their witness measure and then samples treatment from its witness measure.
Definition (Lean source)
The witness data law samples covariates, then treatment, and then a two-point outcome distribution whose mean is the witness conditional mean.
Definition (Lean source)
The witness potential-outcome process returns the observed outcome at the realized treatment and otherwise returns the witness conditional mean at the queried treatment.
Definition (Lean source)
The witness law packages the explicit data law, covariate law, conditional mean, treatment density, covariate density, and potential-outcome process into one model.
Definition (Lean source)
If the covariate density is nonnegative on the cube and integrates to one there, then the witness covariate measure is a probability measure.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
If the treatment density is nonnegative and integrates to one on the unit interval, then the witness treatment measure is a probability measure.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Helpers.Witness.HolderAux 7 declarations
The all-zero covariate vector lies in the unit covariate cube in every dimension.
Proof (Lean source)
If the treatment-window radius is nonnegative, the window contains its center point.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The unit covariate cube is compact in every finite dimension.
The unit covariate cube has finite Lebesgue volume in every finite dimension.
Proof (Lean source)
A univariate function that belongs to a Hölder ball of a given radius also belongs to any larger-radius Hölder ball of the same smoothness order on the same set.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
A multivariate function that belongs to a Hölder ball of a given radius also belongs to any larger-radius Hölder ball of the same smoothness order on the same set.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
A constant multivariate function belongs to a Hölder ball whenever the absolute size of the constant is at most the ball radius and the radius is nonnegative.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Helpers.Witness.KL 4 declarations
Bump-support concentration: the doseAMeasure-integral of ψ((a−t_0)/h)² is at most 2(M−η_0)·h, because ψ is supported in (t_0−h, t_0+h) ⊆ window (for 0 < h ≤ ε_0) where the treatment density q0 is bounded by M−η_0.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Single-observation KL budget: the joint KL between the two witness data laws is at most 16 λ² (M−η_0) / B² · h^{2α+1}. GENUINE and bump-driven (NONZERO): it is the (A,X)-integral of the per-fibre two-point-channel KL, not a Dirac collapse.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The two single-observation witness laws are mutually absolutely continuous and have integrable log-likelihood ratio (each fibre channel has positive mass on both atoms {B,−B}, so the rn-derivative is bounded). These are the hypotheses of productKL_tensorization.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
n-fold KL budget via product tensorization: the KL between the n-fold product witness laws is at most n · (single-obs budget).
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Helpers.Witness.Measure 6 declarations
If the component laws are probability measures and the two-point means are bounded inside the outcome range, then the witness data law is a probability measure.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Under the valid two-point outcome construction, marginalizing the witness data law to covariates recovers the witness covariate measure.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Under the stated outcome and treatment-law assumptions, the witness covariate density is tied to the covariate marginal of the witness data law.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The witness potential-outcome process is consistent with the observed outcome at the realized treatment for every observation.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
If the two-point outcome support is contained in the target bound, then the witness data law almost surely has outcomes inside that bounded interval.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
If the two-point outcome support is contained in the target bound, then the witness law satisfies the bounded-outcome condition at that bound.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Helpers.Witness.Membership 4 declarations
Generic existence of an i.i.d. sample with a prescribed probability law. Discharges the i.i.d.-sampling existential of IidSampling; this is exactly Causalean.Stat.HasIIDSample, which every probability measure satisfies.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The genuine witness's data law puts the covariate X in the cube [0,1]^d a.s.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The genuine witness's data law puts the treatment A in [0,1] a.s.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The genuine two-point witness lies in the anisotropic Hölder dose-response class. Only the treatment regression is perturbed (by the bump), the slack baseline (p_0, q_0) is frozen, and the two semantic ties hold for the genuine joint law.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Helpers.Witness.PiCond 4 declarations
Under a valid two-point outcome construction, marginalizing the witness data law to treatment and covariates gives exactly the witness treatment-covariate measure.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The witness treatment-covariate measure is the product of the treatment measure and the covariate measure.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
If the treatment density is nonnegative and both component densities integrate to one, then the joint treatment-covariate measure has product density.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Under the stated positivity, normalization, and bounded-mean assumptions, the witness treatment density is a valid conditional treatment density for the witness law.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Helpers.Witness.Regression 4 declarations
The A-marginal of the shared (A,X)-law is doseAMeasure q0.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
The realized-treatment level is a.s. not equal to any fixed level a: the treatment has a Lebesgue density q0, so {O | O.A = a} is doseDataMeasure-null.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Semantic tie 1 (genuine regression). Under the genuine joint law, the conditional mean of Y given (A,X) equals μ_ζ(A,X), because the outcome channel twoPointMean B (μ_ζ(a,x)) has mean exactly μ_ζ(a,x). This forbids the Dirac/ decoupled laundering: μ is the real regression of the data law.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Semantic tie 2 (ignorability). The potential outcome Y(a) equals the regression mean μ_ζ(a,X) almost surely (the realized A hits the fixed level a only on a q0-null set), so Y(a) is X-measurable and Y(a) ⟂ A | X.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
Helpers.Witness.Theta 2 declarations
For a normalized covariate density, the witness target value at the center treatment equals the signed bump amplitude.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
For a normalized covariate density, the separation between the positive and negative witness target values is twice the bump amplitude without the sign.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
T_CertifiedPartialBetaFrontier 1 declarations
Under baseline-submodel slack, every fixed beta > 0 has the oracle lower floor eventually. In the smooth-covariate regime the floor matches the published rho_n exponent; in the deficient regime the published comparator has a strictly smaller exponent and no same-class upper endpoint is asserted.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
T_FrontierBracketDeficient 1 declarations
Certified deficient-covariate regime theorem. Assume the strict-slack baseline. For every β > 0 and every 0 < s < d/4 (4s < d) there is c > 0 such that, for all sufficiently large n, R_n ≥ c n^{-2α/(2α+1)}, while ρ_n = n^{-2/(1+d/(4s)+1/α)} has a strictly smaller exponent. The same-class upper endpoint C ρ_n is NOT discharged.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
T_OracleRegimeReduction 1 declarations
Oracle regime reduction. Under the assumptions of sharp_pointwise_lower_bound, if s ≥ d/4 (d ≤ 4s) then ρ_n = n^{-2α/(2α+1)} and hence R_n ≥ c n^{-2α/(2α+1)} = c ρ_n for some c > 0. The certified lower floor reduces to the classical interior pointwise nonparametric regression barrier.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
T_SharpMinimaxSmoothCovariate 1 declarations
Certified smooth-covariate regime theorem. Assume the strict-slack baseline. For every β > 0 and every s ≥ d/4 (d ≤ 4s) there is c > 0 such that, for all sufficiently large n, R_n ≥ c n^{-2α/(2α+1)} = c ρ_n. The certified lower floor lands on the same exponent as ρ_n; NO same-class upper bound is claimed.
Formal statement
Proof (Lean source)
T_SharpPointwiseLowerBound 1 declarations
Certified kernel converse. Assume the strict-slack baseline. For every β > 0 there is c > 0, depending only on the fixed model radii and the slack baseline, such that for all sufficiently large n, R_n(P_{α,β,s}(M,c_0,ε_0,t_0), t_0) ≥ c n^{-2α/(2α+1)} — the classical interior treatment-regression pointwise rate, uniformly over every β > 0.